On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 9:38 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 3:58 PM Peter Eisentraut
> > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> On 2019-11-08 14:38, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >>> I am planning to commit and backpatch this till PG10 where it was
> >>> introduced on Monday morning (IST). Pavel agreed that this is a good
> >>> change in the other thread where we need it [1]. It is not an urgent
> >>> thing, so I can wait if we think this is not a good time to commit
> >>> this. Let me know if anyone has objections?
>
> >> I think the change makes sense for master, but I don't think it should
> >> be backpatched.
>
> > Fair enough. Attached patch with a proposed commit message.
>
> I don't have an opinion on whether it's appropriate to back-patch
> this, but I do have an opinion that Monday morning is the worst
> possible schedule for committing such a thing. We are already
> past the point where we can expect to get reports from the slowest
> buildfarm critters (e.g. Valgrind builds) before Monday's
> back-branch wraps. Anything that is even slightly inessential
> should be postponed until after those releases are tagged.
>
> If it's HEAD-only, of course, it's business as usual.
>
I am planning to go with Peter's suggestion and will push in
HEAD-only. So, I think that should be fine.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
