On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > >>> And perhaps associated PIDs? > >> > >> Yeah, that can be useful, if others also feel like it is important, I can > >> look into preparing a patch for the same. > > > > Thanks. > > Thom, what do you think the EXPLAIN output should look like, > specifically? Or anyone else who feels like answering. > > I don't think it would be very useful to repeat the entire EXPLAIN > output n times, once per worker. That sounds like a loser.
>
Yes, it doesn't seem good idea to repeat the information, but what
about the cases when different workers perform scan on different
relations (partitions in case of Append node) or may be performs a
different operation in Sort or join node parallelism.
