Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+PVf4sqrugRpMt_byDDMN3dE0O-tKq-9AogwPrrYFQvA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:42 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 10:19, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:01 AM Masahiko Sawada
> > <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've attached the latest version patch set. The patch set includes all
> > > discussed points regarding index AM options as well as shared cost
> > > balance. Also I added some test cases used all types of index AM.
> > >
> >
> > I have reviewed the first patch and made a number of modifications
> > that include adding/modifying comments, made some corrections and
> > modifications in the documentation. You can find my changes in
> > v33-0001-delta-amit.patch.  See, if those look okay to you, if so,
> > please include those in the next version of the patch.  I am attaching
> > both your version of patch and delta changes by me.
>
> Thank you.
>
> All changes look good to me. But after changed the 0002 patch the two
> macros for parallel vacuum options (VACUUM_OPTIONS_SUPPORT_XXX) is no
> longer necessary. So we can remove them and can add if we need them
> again.
>

Sounds reasonable.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files