On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 16, 2024 8:33 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, we can consider outputting some information via this function
> > > like how many slots are synced and persisted but not sure what would
> > > be appropriate here. Because one can anyway find that or more
> > > information by querying pg_replication_slots. I think we can keep
> > > discussing what makes more sense as a return value but let's commit
> > > the debug/log patches as they will be helpful to analyze BF failures or any
> > other issues reported.
> >
> > Agreed. Here is new patch set as suggested. I used debug2 in the 040 as it could
> > provide more information about communication between primary and standby.
> > This also doesn't increase noticeable testing time on my machine for debug
> > build.
>
> Sorry, there was a miss in the DEBUG message, I should have used
> UINT64_FORMAT for XLogSegNo(uint64) instead of %ld. Here is a small patch
> to fix this.
>
Thanks for noticing this. I have pushed all your debug patches. Let's
hope if there is a BF failure next time, we can gather enough
information to know the reason of the same.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.