On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Setting parallel_workers to 8 changes the threshold for the parallel to even
>> be considered from parellel_tuple_cost <= 0.0049 to <= 0.0076. So it is
>> going in the correct direction, but not by enough to matter.
>>
>
> You might want to play with cpu_tuple_cost and or seq_page_cost.
>
I don't know whether the patch will completely solve your problem, but
this seems to be the right thing to do. Do you think we should stick
this for next CF?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
