On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit confused, why aren't we simply adding LSN interlock
>> checks for toast? Doesn't look that hard? Seems like a much more
>> natural course of fixing this issue?
>
> I took some time trying to see what you have in mind, and I'm
> really not "getting it".
>
Isn't it possible if we initialize lsn and whenTaken in SnapshotToast
when old_snapshot_threshold > 0 and add a check for
HeapTupleSatisfiesToast in TestForOldSnapshot()?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
