Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+5=5dqNS=S1DcEOsMiuWQz3+kMgEL8x-S60irZuAcm7A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:00 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:24:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:48 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > Hmm, I thought when decode_combined flag is set to false means we will
> > display the raw flags set on the tuple without any further
> > interpretation.  I think that is what is most people in thread
> > advocated about.
>
> Sorry if I created any confusion.  When set to false then the raw list
> of flags is returned, and that's the default.
>

I think that is what we have not done in one of the cases pointed by me.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions