Re: Replication slot stats misgivings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+467z2=vTNy6w7L8ZV5ci9=Fva4TDBRoxaQPOH24Nd5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication slot stats misgivings  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 6:19 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:58 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >
> > IMO, independent of the shutdown / startup issue, it'd be worth writing
> > a patch tracking the bytes sent independently of the slot stats storage
> > issues. That would also make the testing for the above cheaper...
>
> Agreed.
>
> I think the bytes sent should be recorded by the decoding plugin, not
> by the core side. Given that table filtering and row filtering,
> tracking the bytes passed to the decoding plugin would not help gauge
> the actual network I/O. In that sense, the description of stream_bytes
> in the doc seems not accurate:
>
> ---
> This and other streaming counters for this slot can be used to gauge
> the network I/O which occurred during logical decoding and allow
> tuning logical_decoding_work_mem.
> ---
>
> It can surely be used to allow tuning logical_decoding_work_mem but it
> could not be true for gauging the network I/O which occurred during
> logical decoding.
>

Agreed. I think we can adjust the wording accordingly.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq debug log
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings