Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1++GG_FOcETYMhf6eeFTMEKPrT_nhWhB6TyPyYNDsoh1g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:56 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-06-11 at 15:43 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > The new patches look mostly good apart from the below cosmetic
> > issues.
> > I think the question is whether we want to do these for PG-14 or
> > postpone them till PG-15. I think these don't appear to be risky
> > changes so we can get them in PG-14 as that might help some outside
> > core solutions as appears to be the case for Jeff.
>
> My main interest here is that I'm working on replication protocol
> support in a rust library. While doing that, I've encountered a lot of
> rough edges (as you may have seen in my recent posts), and this patch
> fixes one of them.
>
> But at the same time, several small changes to the protocol spread
> across several releases introduces more opportunity for confusion.
>
> If we are confident this is the right direction, then v14 makes sense
> for consistency. But if waiting for v15 might result in a better
> change, then we should probably just get it into the July CF for v15.
>

If that is the case, I would prefer July CF v15. The patch is almost
ready, so I'll try to get it early in the July CF. Ajin, feel free to
post the patch after addressing some minor comments raised by me
yesterday.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert
Next
From: Han Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: Questions about support function and abbreviate