Re: storing an explicit nonce - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Chen
Subject Re: storing an explicit nonce
Date
Msg-id CAA3qoJks3eA6YAUehipf5fF5j66WAviMGq+vSVduJxpeOdkczw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:12 PM Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com> wrote:

When the checksums are disabled, we can use these unused checksum values as a counter to make sure we have different nonce even if we don't write the new WAL record.


Ah, well, I think I've figured it out for myself. In this way, we can't protect against torn pages...

--
There is no royal road to learning.
HighGo Software Co.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Chen
Date:
Subject: Re: storing an explicit nonce
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions