On 6 October 2011 12:52, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am sending a version with regress tests and basic documentation
Hi Pavel,
I think this sentence needs rewriting:
"checkfunction is the name of a previously registered function that
will be called when a new function in the language is created, to
check the function by statemnt CHECK FUNCTION or CHECK TRIGGER."
to something like:
"checkfunction is the name of an existing function that will be called
whenever a CHECK FUNCTION or CHECK TRIGGER is requested on a function
written in the language."
And shouldn't this apply to ALTER LANGUAGE too?
And there seem to be copy/paste symptoms in
doc/src/sgml/ref/check_function.sgml where it shows the definition of
CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE TRIGGER instead of CHECK FUNCTION and CHECK
TRIGGER.
In src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h there's the error message "there are
no plan for query:". This should probably read "there is no plan for
query:". This appears more than once.
And "cannot to identify real type for record type variable" doesn't
sound right. Firstly "to" shouldn't be in there, and referring to a
"real" type is ambiguous as there is a data type called "real". This
appears at least twice.
In src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c:
"cannot to determine a result of dynamic SQL" should be "cannot
determine result of dynamic SQL".
Also, I recommend rebasing this patch as it doesn't apply cleanly. In
particular, the following fail:
src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_funcs.c
src/test/regress/expected/plpgsql.out
src/test/regress/sql/plpgsql.sql
I haven't tried actually testing the patch itsel, but I will probably
give it a go if a rebased version appears. :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
