On 14 April 2012 15:58, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> I have a question though. What happens when this is set to "write"
>> (or "remote_write" as proposed) but it's being used on a standalone
>> primary? At the moment it's not documented what level of guarantee
>> this would provide.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/warm-standby.html#SYNCHRONOUS-REPLICATION-HA
> -----------------
> Commits made when synchronous_commit is set to on or write will
> wait until the synchronous standby responds. The response may
> never occur if the last, or only, standby should crash.
> -----------------
>
> Is this description not enough? If not enough, how should we change
> the document?
No, that's not what I was referring to. If you don't have a standby
(i.e. a single, isolated database cluster with no replication), and
its synchronous_commit is set to 'remote_write', what effect does that
have?
--
Thom
