Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Mariel Cherkassky
Subject Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage
Date
Msg-id CA+t6e1n9JVx8_6JsaUShyZ3H8XTEq0UWj7qiByy1WLBS=gmNXg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage  (MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com>)
Responses Re: [Junk released by User action] Re: [External] Postgres DatabaseDisk Usage  (Jeremiah Bauer <jbauer@agristats.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Can you try to dump the database and then restore it with a different name ? Check if the size of the restored one is the same. 



On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 7:12 PM MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com wrote:
Would you use pg_total_relation_size, not pg_relation_size in your sizing query?  This will capture associated indexes and such.

Regards,
Michael Vitale

Friday, February 8, 2019 12:05 PM
Ok I am out of ideas :)
Sorry, I’ll let the experts step in here :)

 btw the 43GB and 439MB look close :) I hope there is no conversion error :) 

--

Regards,
Vijay
Friday, February 8, 2019 11:29 AM
We don't have any blobs or json objects in this database.  I've sanitized the output of the query below, and toast doesn't show up until well down the list.

FVDM=# SELECT nspname || '.' || relname AS "relation",
FVDM-#     pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(C.oid)) AS "size"
FVDM-#   FROM pg_class C
FVDM-#   LEFT JOIN pg_namespace N ON (N.oid = C.relnamespace)
FVDM-#   WHERE nspname NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema')
FVDM-#   ORDER BY pg_relation_size(C.oid) DESC
FVDM-#   LIMIT 20;
                       relation                       |  size  
------------------------------------------------------+---------
 mart.*****_data                                        | 301 MB
 mart.detailed_*****                 | 66 MB
 mart.major_*****              | 58 MB
 public.temp_*****                                 | 20 MB
 public.temp_*****                      | 13 MB
 mart.customer_*****       | 11 MB
 public.temp_*****| 11 MB
 mart.major_*****                  | 1888 kB
 public.temp_*****            | 1880 kB
 public.hold_*****           | 1424 kB
 public.temp_*****                          | 1208 kB
 mart.ranking_*****                                 | 1144 kB
 public.temp_*****          | 1080 kB
 public.temp_*****       | 984 kB
 mart.customer_*****                      | 696 kB
 mart.economic_*****                      | 456 kB
 public.hold_*****                          | 448 kB
 mart.expanded_*****             | 384 kB
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2618                               | 376 kB
 public.temp_*****       | 232 kB

I also queried just for toast tables:

FVDM=# SELECT nspname || '.' || relname AS "relation",
    pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(C.oid)) AS "size"
  FROM pg_class C
  LEFT JOIN pg_namespace N ON (N.oid = C.relnamespace)
  WHERE nspname NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema') and c.relname ~* 'toast'
  ORDER BY pg_relation_size(C.oid) DESC
  LIMIT 20;
           relation            |    size    
-------------------------------+------------
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2618        | 376 kB
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2619        | 48 kB
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2618_index  | 16 kB
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2619_index  | 16 kB
 pg_toast.pg_toast_13104_index | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_3596_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2606_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2620_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2609_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2396_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_3592_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_1255_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_13109_index | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_13114_index | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_13119_index | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_13124_index | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_13129_index | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_13134_index | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2604_index  | 8192 bytes
 pg_toast.pg_toast_2964_index  | 8192 bytes

--


Jeremiah


From: Vijaykumar Jain <vjain@opentable.com>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 11:21 AM
To: Jeremiah Bauer
Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage
 
Do you have any blobs or large json objects as relnames?
they generally end up as toast tables .
Which may be the ones holding the space.



On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 9:25 PM Jeremiah Bauer <jbauer@agristats.com> wrote:
--

Regards,
Vijay
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email (and any attachments) is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or the attachments, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this email or any attachment is strictly prohibited and you should not read the message or read or open any attachment. If you have received this email by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete it permanently from your system. Agri Stats, Inc. and its subsidiaries will not be held liable to any person or entity resulting from the unintended or unauthorized use of any information contained in this email.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: MichaelDBA
Date:
Subject: Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage
Next
From: Jeremiah Bauer
Date:
Subject: Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage