Re: range_agg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul A Jungwirth
Subject Re: range_agg
Date
Msg-id CA+renyWOSQ5P-=KCqti4WN1hdS9h9O5kFSvXqodq49XaR43HkA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: range_agg  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: range_agg
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 10:45 -0700, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> > Right now I'm planning to do all that before sending a patch. I'm
> > happy to send something something in-progress too, but I don't want
> > to
> > waste any reviewers' time. If folks want an early peak though let me
> > know. (You can also find my messy progress at
> > https://github.com/pjungwir/postgresql/tree/multirange)
>
> Sounds good. The rule I use is: "will the feedback I get be helpful, or
> just tell me about obvious problems I already know about".

Here are some patches to add multiranges. I tried to split things up a
bit but most things landed in parts 1 & 2.

Things I haven't done (but would be interested in doing or getting help with):

- gist opclass
- spgist opclass
- typanalyze
- selectivity
- anyrangearray
- anymultirangearray?
- UNNEST for multirange and/or a way to convert it to an array
- indexing/subscripting (see patch for standardized subscripting)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding possible future conformance headaches in JSON work
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables