Re: range_agg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul A Jungwirth
Subject Re: range_agg
Date
Msg-id CA+renyV+ER5HXjFmw=JnOfX_ZeMWjECA9VPjCQ+fF23QFVTYGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: range_agg  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
Responses Re: range_agg
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:54 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
> Here is an initial patch. I'd love to have some feedback! :-)

Here is a v2 rebased off current master. No substantive changes, but
it does fix one trivial git conflict.

After talking with David in Ottawa and hearing a good use-case from
one other person for his proposed weighted_range_agg and
covering_range_agg, I think *will* add those to this patch, but if
anyone wants to offer feedback on my approach so far, I'd appreciate
that too.

Yours,
Paul

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock