Re: libpq compression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: libpq compression
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcWC63iJye557H17biN05CR8PpuFYuOovH+RVwrTnqRz8g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq compression  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: libpq compression
List pgsql-hackers
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:39 AM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>
> On 3/25/19 1:04 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 25.03.2019 11:06, David Steele wrote:
> >> Konstantin,
> >>
> >>
> >> This patch appears to be failing tests so I have marked it Waiting on
> >> Author.
> >>
> >> I have also removed the reviewer since no review had been done. Maybe
> >> somebody else will have a look.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >
> > Can you please inform me which tests are failed?
> > I have done "make check-world" and there were no failed tests.
> > Actually if compression is not enabled (and it is disabled by default
> > unless explicitly requested by client), there should be no difference
> > with vanilla Postgres.
> > So it will be strange if some tests are failed without using compression.
>
> Check out the cfbot report at http://commitfest.cputube.org

I guess it's red because the last posted patch happened to be my experimental
patch (based indeed on a broken revision v11), not the one posted by Konstantin.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current