Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcV=sHTifgemto-nmwnf7ePGC1Vr7Ltq8UZa2SrkpdT3hg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
List pgsql-hackers
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:03 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:42 AM Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM Thomas Munro
> > <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > > It passes make check on Unix and Windows, though currently it's
> > > failing some of the TAP tests for reasons I'm looking into (possibly
> > > due to bugs in the lower level patches, not sure).
> > >
> > I looked into the regression failures when the tap-tests are enabled.
> > It seems that we're not estimating and allocating the shared memory
> > for rollback-hash tables correctly. I've added a patch to fix the
> > same.
>
> Thanks Kuntal.

Thanks for the patch,

Unfortunately, cfbot complains about these patches and can't apply them for
some reason, so I did this manually to check it out. All of them (including the
fix from Kuntal) were applied without conflicts, but compilation stopped here

undoinsert.c: In function ‘UndoRecordAllocateMulti’:
undoinsert.c:547:18: error: ‘urec’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
   urec->uur_info = 0;  /* force recomputation of info bits */
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~

Could you please post a fixed version of the patch?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command fromrecovery.conf or command line
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT