Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcUZFYNFRoU2zL+VQSyPx8+oA82ygv3M+Lrksoew_Go1FQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:43 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> čt 31. 1. 2019 v 16:39 odesílatel Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> napsal:
>>
>> Would anybody object to me pushing part 0001 soon?  It seems pointless
>> to force Dmitry keep rebasing a huge renaming patch all this time.  I
>> think the general feeling is that this is a desirable change, so let's
>> keep things moving.
>>
>> That having been said ... while the current 0001 patch does apply
>> semi-cleanly (`git apply -3` does it), it does not compile, probably
>> because of header refactoring.  Please rebase and make sure that each
>> individual patch compiles cleanly.
>
> +1

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:45 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, sorry for that, I'll fix it in a moment.

The moment was longer than I expected, but here is the rebased version, where
all the individual patches can be applied and compiled cleanly (although there
is still functional dependency between 0002 and 0003, since the former
introduces a new subscripting without any implementation, and the latter
introduces an implementation for array data type).

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH_RPATH
Next
From: Surafel Temesgen
Date:
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option