> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Although there are still some rough edges, e.g. going forth, back and forth
> again leads to a sutiation, when `_bt_first` is not applied anymore and the
> first element is wrongly skipped. I'll try to fix it with the next version of
> patch.
It turns out that `_bt_skip` was unnecessary applied every time when scan was
restarted from the beginning. Here is the fixed version of patch.
