Re: large object max size - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Luis Flores
Subject Re: large object max size
Date
Msg-id CA+nXnG9wZR+240K4r41=_GEjVtcqA-8nGNxyN_o9iyQoyNOENw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: large object max size  (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>)
List pgsql-jdbc
I've used 300MB objects, no problem. The only limit is java max
memory, the object load uses around 1.5 times the object size, at
least on ASCII transfers, I'm not sure if binary transfers are already
default.

Luis Flores

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au> wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 11:52 PM, pramodh reddy wrote:
>>
>> What is the maximum size of large object supported by the latest JDBC
>> driver ?
>
>
> I haven't explicitly tested, but there's no reason to expect it's any
> different from PostgreSQL's own maximums.
>
> That said, I wouldn't personally use large objects anywhere near the
> maximum. The performance won't be great, and it's a pain for backup and
> restore.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: large object max size
Next
From: dmp
Date:
Subject: Re: drop in performance using jdbc driver version 9