Re: [psycopg] speed concerns with executemany() - Mailing list psycopg

From Daniele Varrazzo
Subject Re: [psycopg] speed concerns with executemany()
Date
Msg-id CA+mi_8Z=ZtA+2e-45fW40KxyQC6QTQVXTWPUwaVWGhswpXdYEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [psycopg] speed concerns with executemany()  (mike bayer <mike_mp@zzzcomputing.com>)
List psycopg
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:12 PM, mike bayer <mike_mp@zzzcomputing.com> wrote:
>
> you'd need to be careful with that as a series of multiple parameter sets
> may have dependencies on each other, not to mention people might find it
> surprising that sequences / defaults / SERIAL etc. aren't firing off in the
> order in which parameter sets were given.

I don't expect the parameters to be interpreted in a different way by
the server: I think the order would be maintained.

-- Daniele


psycopg by date:

Previous
From: Oleksandr Shulgin
Date:
Subject: Re: [psycopg] Solving the SQL composition problem
Next
From: Daniele Varrazzo
Date:
Subject: Re: [psycopg] speed concerns with executemany()