Re: BDR - DDL Locking - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Will McCormick
Subject Re: BDR - DDL Locking
Date
Msg-id CA+jgkY5E_if1cEZ837k2SU777MMRYhF+Ctb5TjuYVg+UCt2JCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BDR - DDL Locking  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hey Craig thank you very much for your response. 

When you say you "attempted to" - what was the outcome? 

I tried a truncate without the cascade option. After that I tried it with the cascade option. The session just hanged indefinitely at that point. There was no rollback and I was testing on an empty table.

Replication was in a ready state on both nodes and both DDL and DML was replicating.

0.9.2.0 BDR

When you say restarting the nodes. I did restart postgres and this didn't help.


On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
What's the *exact* BDR version?

When you say you "attempted to" - what was the outcome? Presumably an
ERROR from the TRUNCATE, right? That would roll back the transaction,
and in the process abort the DDL lock acquisition attempt.

Are you sure replication was working normally prior to this point,
with no issues?

The global DDL lock isn't a true lock in the sense that it appears in
pg_locks, etc. If you roll back the transaction trying to acquire it,
or terminate the PostgreSQL backend attempting to acquire it - such as
your TRUNCATE - using pg_terminate_backend(...) then it will be
removed automatically. If for any reason that is not the case (which
it shouldn't be) then restarting the nodes will clear it.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: trouble downloading postgres 9.4 for RHEL 6.x
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: BDR - DDL Locking