Il giorno 02/ott/2011 12:56, "Robert Haas" <
robertmhaas@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
> <
euler@timbira.com> wrote:
>> On 01-10-2011 17:44, Daniel Farina wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Tom Lane<
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ISTM it would be reasonably non-controversial to allow users to issue
>>>> pg_cancel_backend against other sessions logged in as the same userID.
>>>> The question is whether to go further than that, and if so how much.
>>>
>>> In *every* case -- and there are many -- where we've had people
>>> express pain, this would have sufficed.
>>>
>> I see. What about passing this decision to DBA? I mean a GUC
>> can_cancel_session = user, dbowner (default is '' -- only superuser). You
>> can select one or both options. This GUC can only be changed by superuser.
>
> Or how about making it a grantable database-level privilege?
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB:
http://www.enterprisedb.com> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
>
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
