Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLyj1Rt6stXaksz=Xe0=TPPypQ4QwWTrQNSds=aFAfgfQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:44 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 5:25 AM Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:01 AM Rinat Shigapov <rinatshigapov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thomas, thank you for the details!
> > >
> > > Have you kept the branch that you used to generate the patch? Which commit should the patch apply to?
> >
> > You can try something like
> > git checkout 'master@{2018-05-13 13:37:00}'
> > to get a commit by date from rev-parse.
>
> I don't have time to work on this currently but if Rinat or others
> want to look into it... maybe I should rebase that experiment on top
> of current master.  Here's the branch:
>
> https://github.com/macdice/postgres/tree/ssi-index-locking-refinements

Erm, I guess I should also post the rebased patches here, for the
mailing list archives.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners