Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLxVtLCo3xD1OEnMSQbq04MKx1G_vQ5SZQNMBSFPR_TpA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)  (Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>)
Responses Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:31 PM Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io> wrote:
> Le mercredi 11 octobre 2023, 10:59:50 CEST Thomas Munro a écrit :
> > The back-patch to 12 was a little trickier than anticipated, but after
> > taking a break and trying again I now have PG 12...17 patches that
> > I've tested against LLVM 10...18 (that's 54 combinations), in every
> > case only with the clang corresponding to LLVM.
>
> Thank you Thomas for those patches, and the extensive testing, I will run my
> own and let you know.

Thanks!  No news is good news, I hope?  I'm hoping to commit this today.

> > I've attached only the patches for master, but the 12-16 versions are
> > available at https://github.com/macdice/postgres/tree/llvm16-$N in
> > case anyone has comments on those.
>
> For PG13 and PG12, it looks like the ExecEvalBoolSubroutineTemplate is not
> used anywhere, as ExecEvalBoolSubroutine was introduced in PG14 if I'm not
> mistaken.

Right, looks like I can remove that in those branches.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)