gharial segfaulting on REL_12_STABLE only - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject gharial segfaulting on REL_12_STABLE only
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLukanJE9W8C+0n8iRsZDpbuhcWOxBMjGaUO-RNHhBGXw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: gharial segfaulting on REL_12_STABLE only
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

This is apparently an EDB-owned machine but I have no access to it
currently (I could ask if necessary).  For some reason it's been
failing for a week, but only on REL_12_STABLE, with this in the log:

2019-08-20 04:31:48.886 MDT [13421:4] LOG:  server process (PID 13871)
was terminated by signal 11: unrecognized signal
2019-08-20 04:31:48.886 MDT [13421:5] DETAIL:  Failed process was
running: SET default_table_access_method = '';

Apparently HPUX's sys_siglist doesn't recognise that most popular of
signals, 11, but by googling I see that it has its traditional meaning
there.  That's clearly in the create_am test:

019-08-20 04:31:22.404 MDT [13871:31] pg_regress/create_am HINT:  Use
DROP ... CASCADE to drop the dependent objects too.
2019-08-20 04:31:22.404 MDT [13871:32] pg_regress/create_am STATEMENT:
 DROP ACCESS METHOD gist2;
2019-08-20 04:31:22.405 MDT [13871:33] pg_regress/create_am LOG:
statement: DROP ACCESS METHOD gist2 CASCADE;
2019-08-20 04:31:22.422 MDT [13871:34] pg_regress/create_am LOG:
statement: SET default_table_access_method = '';

Perhaps it was really running the next statement.

It's hard to see how cdc8d371e2, the only non-doc commit listed on the
first failure, could have anything to do with that.

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: A problem about partitionwise join
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: gharial segfaulting on REL_12_STABLE only