Re: Where are we on supporting LLVM's opaque-pointer changes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Where are we on supporting LLVM's opaque-pointer changes?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLXK6fWdL3hitdc8ksmSLyk5wNA57HLO5FTyzE8iRpQ=w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Where are we on supporting LLVM's opaque-pointer changes?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 2:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I know we've been letting this topic slide, but we are out of runway.
> I propose adding this as a must-fix open item for PG 16.

I had a patch that solved many of the problems[1], but it isn't all
the way there and I got stuck.  I am going to look at it together with
Andres in the next couple of days, get unstuck, and aim to get a patch
out this week.  More soon.

[1] https://github.com/macdice/postgres/tree/llvm15



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: segfault tied to "IS JSON predicate" commit
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: idea: multiple arguments to_regclass function