On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:24 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2020-Apr-09, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > It seems worth pointing out that the new GetWalRcvWriteRecPtr function
> > has a different signature from the original one -- so any third-party
> > code using the original function will now get a compile failure that
> > should alert them that they need to change their code to call
> > GetWalRcvFlushRecPtr instead. Maybe we should add a line or two in the
> > comments GetWalRcvWriteRecPtr to make this explicit.
>
> After using codesearch.debian.net and finding no results, I decided that
> this is not worth the effort.
Thanks for checking. Yeah, it looks like you're right.
codesearch.debian.net is cool.
