Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLR47Y9W38GQBNnmWrzrHWzqtVQJ7YK+0=iGuop3MMgWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 6:36 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:38 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So, to summarise the new patch that I'm attaching to this email as 0001:
>
> This all makes sense to me, and I didn't see anything obviously wrong
> looking through the patch, either.

Thanks.

> > However it seems that I have something wrong, because CI is failing on
> > Windows; I ran out of time for looking into that today, but wanted to
> > post what I have so far since I know we have an open item or two to
> > close here ASAP...
>
> :-(

It passes sometimes and fails sometimes.  Here's the weird failure I
need to debug:


https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6033765456674816/log/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/log/regress_log_032_relfilenode_reuse

Right at the end, it says:

Warning: unable to close filehandle GEN26 properly: Bad file
descriptor during global destruction.
Warning: unable to close filehandle GEN21 properly: Bad file
descriptor during global destruction.
Warning: unable to close filehandle GEN6 properly: Bad file descriptor
during global destruction.

I don't know what it means (Windows' fd->handle mapping table got
corrupted?) or even which program is printing it (you'd think maybe
perl?  but how could that be affected by anything I did in
postgres.exe, but if it's not perl why is it always at the end like
that?).  Hrmph.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: