Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLMoeZNZY6gYdLUQmuoW_a8bKyLvtuZkd_zHcGVOfDzBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
List pgsql-hackers
The nearby thread about searching for uses of volatile reminded me: we
can now drop a bunch of these in postmaster.c.  The patch I originally
wrote to do that as part of this series somehow morphed into an
experimental patch to nuke all global variables[1], but of course we
should at least drop the now redundant use of volatile and
sigatomic_t.  See attached.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGKH_RPAo%3DNgPfHKj--565aL1qiVpUGdWt1_pmJehY%2Bdmw%40mail.gmail.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Small omission in type_sanity.sql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Small omission in type_sanity.sql