Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGL2UZSwdZRQ6O7sLXN_gWgr-_VaztBfj_GH+WCAWknMfg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:12 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> I start looking at the patch, there is a couple of problems with the patch. The first one is the OID conflict, which
Ifixed on my machine. The second problem is assertion failure. I think you have not compiled the PostgreSQL code with
theassertion.
 

Hi Peter,

Looks like there was some good feedback for this WIP project last time
around.  It's currently in "Needs Review" status in the July
Commitfest.  To encourage more review and see some automated compile
and test results, could we please have a fresh rebase?  The earlier
patches no longer apply.

Thanks,

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensureclean shutdown)
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptionsrepresentation for each relation kind instead