Re: A test for replay of regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKwH-mDeReafALoR5Ui5MVM_HKjyskbkMh+U=6oKk+E3w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A test for replay of regression tests  (Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: A test for replay of regression tests
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 7:37 PM Anastasia Lubennikova
<lubennikovaav@gmail.com> wrote:
> вт, 8 июн. 2021 г. в 02:44, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>:
>> Thank you for working on this test set!
>> I was especially glad to see the skip-tests option for pg_regress. I think it will become a very handy tool for
hackers.
>>
>> To try the patch I had to resolve a few merge conflicts, see a rebased version in attachments.
>>
>> >       auth_extra       => [ '--create-role', 'repl_role' ]);
>> This line and the comment above it look like some copy-paste artifacts. Did I get it right? If so, I suggest
removingthem. 
>> Other than that, the patch looks good to me.
>
> For some reason, it failed on cfbot, so I'll switch it back to 'Waiting on author'.
> BTW, do I get it right, that cfbot CI will need some adjustments to print regression.out for this test?
>
> See one more revision of the patch attached. It contains the following changes:
> - rebase to recent main
> - removed 'auth_extra' piece, that I mentioned above.
> - added lacking make clean and gitignore changes.

Thanks!  Yeah, there does seem to be a mysterious CI failure there,
not reproducible locally for me.  You're right that it's not dumping
enough information to diagnose the problem... I will look into it
tomorrow.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix dropped object handling in pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands