Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir()
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKrtJmeb8n6AWFniriwb1abmA0G-xWgp97LFZ1C65OE3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir()  (Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir()
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:05 AM Juan José Santamaría Flecha
<juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:41 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for confirming.  I ran the Windows patch through pgindent,
>> fixed a small typo, and pushed.
>
> Great, thanks. Should we include something from this discussion as comments?

I dunno, it seems like this may be common knowledge for Windows people
and I was just being paranoid by asking for more info as a
non-Windowsian, but if you want to propose new comments or perhaps
just a pointer to one central place where we explain how that works, I
wouldn't be against that.

FWIW I just spotted a couple of very suspicious looking failures for
build farm animal "walleye", a "MinGW64 8.1.0" system, that say:

c:\\pgbuildfarm\\pgbuildroot\\HEAD\\pgsql.build\\src\\bin\\pg_upgrade>RMDIR
/s/q "c:\\pgbuildfarm\\pgbuildroot\\HEAD\\pgsql.build\\src\\bin\\pg_upgrade\\tmp_check\\data.old"
The directory is not empty.

Then I noticed it failed the same way 8 days ago, so I don't know
what's up with that but it looks like we didn't break it...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audo-detect and use -moutline-atomics compilation flag for aarch64
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: default partition and concurrent attach partition