Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKqPgU=pLUinnqN5qsPS2d3X4XXnYpCuphK2Hwpq03DRA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces
Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:01 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> At Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:28:46 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:06:50AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > > At Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:39:06 +1300, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote in
> > >> Thanks, you're right.  Test on a Win10 VM.  Here's a new version.
> >
> > Looks fine to me.
> >
> > > FYI, on Windows11, pg_basebackup didn't work correctly without the
> > > patch.  So this looks like fixing an undiscovered bug as well.
> >
> > Well, that's not really a long-time bug but just a side effect of
> > in-place tablespaces because we don't use them in many test cases
> > yet, is it?
>
> No, we don't. So just FYI.

Ok, I pushed the fix for pg_basebackup.

As for the complaint about pg_tablespace_location() failing, would it
be better to return an empty string?  That's what was passed in as
LOCATION.  Something like the attached.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "lupeng"
Date:
Subject: Change the csv log to 'key:value' to facilitate the user to understanding and processing of logs
Next
From: "kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup