On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:47 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 6:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > > So that gives a very simple back-patchable patch.
> >
> > Hmm, so is the *rest* of that function perfectly okay with being
> > interrupted?
>
> It looks OK to me. There aren't any CFI()s in there.
Pushed. That closes CF #2657.