On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:55 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I was working on expanding tests for AIO and as part of that wrote a test for
> temp tables -- our coverage is fairly awful, there were many times during AIO
> development where I knew I had trivially reachable temp table specific bugs
> but all tests passed.
>
> The test for that does trigger the problem described above and is fixed by the
> patches in this thread (which I included in the other thread):
Thanks. Alright, I'm assuming that you don't have any objections to
the way I restyled that API, so I'm going to go ahead and push some of
these shortly, and then follow up with a few newer patches that
simplify and improve the look-ahead and advice control. More very
soon.