On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:39 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Scratch that. I like the more ambitious idea better. I originally
> thought it would be less back-patchable, but that's nonsense -- this
> was a straight up thinko in ancient commit bdaabb9b and we should just
> fix it properly. That is, we should treat this case as a
> generalisation of the the PredXact->WritableSxactCount == 0 case, it's
> just that we had to do more work to figure that out. Here's a patch
> like that.
Here's a better version. I plan to push this tomorrow if there are no
objections.