Re: Tests "with" and "alter_table" suffer from name clash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Tests "with" and "alter_table" suffer from name clash
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKETERzQfKZBXnK7oMCJ3GucXnnaq1mKQy-nKfq0J5Meg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tests "with" and "alter_table" suffer from name clash  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Tests "with" and "alter_table" suffer from name clash  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 3:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Looks reasonable.  We really should avoid using such common
> names for short-lived tables in any case --- it's an invitation
> to trouble.  So I'd vote for changing the other use of "test", too.

In fact only REL_10_STABLE had the problem, because commit 2cf8c7aa
already fixed the other instance in later branches.  I'd entirely
forgotten that earlier discussion, which apparently didn't quite go
far enough.   So I only needed to push the with.sql change.  Done.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Tests "with" and "alter_table" suffer from name clash
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Tests "with" and "alter_table" suffer from name clash