On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:17 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... (though my patch could be a little sneakier and steal
> all the bytes right up to the = sign to get more space for our
> message!).
Here's one like that. No musl here -- does this work Wolfgang? Do we
think it's generous enough with space in practice that we could just
always do this for __linux__ systems without anyone noticing (ie
including glibc users)? Should we be more specific about which LD_*
variables? Do people not doing hacking/testing ever really set those,
eg on production servers? This code path was once used by up to a
dozen or so OSes but they're all dead, only Linux, Solaris and macOS
left, and I don't have any reason to think they suffer from this
problem and Macs don't even follow the SysV LD_ naming convention,
hence gating on Linux.
