Re: What's the best way to get flex and bison on Windows? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: What's the best way to get flex and bison on Windows?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGK1LvNEAUO3q46Tji-CAJw2fb5Fx5XiNmdY=zskRAHTmg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's the best way to get flex and bison on Windows?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: What's the best way to get flex and bison on Windows?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:49 PM Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The reason I use chocolatey is to avoid having a dependency on Msys/Msys2 ;-)

Heh.  Well Chocolatey looks like a really nice project, and I see that
they package PostgreSQL, and their site shows 85,427 downloads.  Neat!
 I just think it's a good idea for this experimental CI to use things
that are already on the image if we can.  FWIW I've had trouble with
other stuff fetched over the network by PostgreSQL CI jobs at times
too (Docbook templates and Ubuntu packages).

> If you're going to link to anything it should probably be to the Msys2
> binaries, because a) they are likely to be more up to date and b)
> unlike msys1 they are available by default for all four VS toolsets
> Appveyor provides.

Ah, OK that sounds like a good plan then.  Any chance you can tell me
what to add to PATH for that?  Changing the 1 to a 2 in the path
mentioned before doesn't work.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: What's the best way to get flex and bison on Windows?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows