On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:45 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Hmmm ... maybe that should be more like
> > if (smartShutState != SMART_NORMAL_USAGE &&
> > backend_type == BACKEND_TYPE_NORMAL)
>
> After some more rethinking and testing, here's a v5 that feels
> fairly final to me. I realized that the logic in canAcceptConnections
> was kind of backwards: it's better to check the main pmState restrictions
> first and then the smart-shutdown restrictions afterwards.
LGTM. I tested this a bit today and it did what I expected for
parallel queries and vacuum, on primary and standby.
> I'm assuming we want to back-patch this as far as 9.6, where parallel
> query began to be a thing.
Yeah. I mean, it's more radical than what I thought we'd be doing for
this, but you could get into real trouble by running in smart shutdown
mode without the autovac infrastructure alive.
