On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:06 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > I also wonder if postgres_fdw should strive to use a longer lived wait event
> > set. For efficiency, if nothing else? That'd avoid the need to create one
> > during error handling.
>
> Seems like a plausible idea. Having to acquire resources to clean up
> an error is an anti-pattern for sure.
FWIW, WRT to the long lived WES idea, I have had patches to explore
several different ways to do that (as I already did successfully for
other areas), and I will write about that again later, but I concluded
that we needed to fix this Windows nonsense first:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/3523/ (That got withdrawn for
being too slow, but I'll resubmit it soon enough...)