Re: BUG #15875: Unexpected serializable isolation error whenINSERTing into a table - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: BUG #15875: Unexpected serializable isolation error whenINSERTing into a table
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJMMUK5WsH=kGWZ+wbYj+a9KvFPW=eucpc+RPCYJx946g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #15875: Unexpected serializable isolation error when INSERTing into a table  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: BUG #15875: Unexpected serializable isolation error whenINSERTing into a table
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:05 PM PG Bug reporting form
<noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
> -- Transaction 1:
>     ```
>     BEGIN TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
>     SELECT id FROM foo WHERE id = 44;

For me, this acquires an SIReadLock on the page because it's an index
only scan.  Then ...

> -- Transaction 2:
>     ```
>     BEGIN TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
>     SELECT id FROM foo WHERE id = 33;

... this does the same, on the same page, so the transactions form a
cycle when they write.  You can see the page locks in the pg_locks
view.  In other words, you can get bogus serialisation failures when
you access nearby keys.  It seems like we could probably fix this in a
future release by switching to tuple locks (or rather TID locks) for
index only scans, as briefly discussed a while ago but not yet
followed up:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEepm%3D2QbqQ_%2BKQQCnhKukF6NEAeq4SqiO3Qxe%2BfHza5-H-jKA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15875: Unexpected serializable isolation error when INSERTing into a table
Next
From: Henri Cook
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15875: Unexpected serializable isolation error whenINSERTing into a table