On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:54 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > > Hrmph... Are you sure you rebuilt the contrib module? Assuming so,
> > > maybe it's failing in a different way for you and me. For me, it
> > > always fails after this break is reached in xlogutil.c:
> >
> > > /* If asked, let's not wait for future WAL. */
> > > if (!wait_for_wal)
> > > break;
> >
> > Hmm. For me, that statement is not reached at all in successful
> > (make installcheck) runs. In a failing run, it's reached with
> > wait_for_wal = false, after which we get the "could not read WAL"
> > failure. Usually that happens twice, as per attached.
>
> Ok, that's the same for me. Next question: why does the patch I
> posted not help? For me, the error "could not read WAL at %X/%X",
> seen on the BF log, is raised by ReadNextXLogRecord() in
> pg_walinspect.c. The patch removes that ereport() entirely (and
> handles NULL in a couple of places).
BTW If you had your local change from debug.patch (upthread), that'd
defeat the patch. I mean this:
+ if(!*errormsg)
+ *errormsg = "decode_queue_head is null";