On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 4:03 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> On 2022-07-25 Mo 11:24, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:08 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Hmm ... an alternative theory is that the test is fine, and what
> >> it's telling us is that get_dirent_type() is still wrong on msys.
> >> Would that end in this symptom?
> > Hmm, possibly yes (if it sees a non-symlink, it'll skip it). If
> > someone can run the test on an msys system, perhaps they could put a
> > debugging elog() into the code modified by 9d3444dc to log d_name and
> > the d_type that is returned? I'm struggling to understand why msys
> > would change the answer though.
>
> I have no idea either. The link exists and it is a junction. I'll see
> about logging details.
From the clues so far, it seems like pgwin32_is_junction(fullpath) was
returning true, but the following code in get_dirent_type(), which was
supposed to be equivalent, is not reached on MSYS (though it
apparently does on MSVC?):
+ if ((fd.dwFileAttributes & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT) != 0 &&
+ (fd.dwReserved0 == IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT))
d->ret.d_type = DT_LNK;
pgwin32_is_junction() uses GetFileAttributes() and tests (attr &
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT) == FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT, which
is like the first condition but lacks the dwReserved0 part. What is
that part doing, and why would it be doing something different in MSVC
and MSYS builds? That code came from 87e6ed7c, recently I was just
trying to fix it by reordering the checks; oh, there was some
discussion about that field[1].
One idea is that something about dwReserved0 or
IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT is different in the open source replacement
system headers supplied by the MinGW project used by MSYS builds
(right?), compared to the "real" Windows SDK's headers used by MSVC
builds.
Or perhaps there is some other dumb mistake, or perhaps the reparse
point really is different, or ... I dunno, I'd probably shove a load
of log messages in there and see what's going on.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABUevEzURN%3DwC95JHvTKFJtEy0eY9rWO42yU%3D59-q8xSwm-Dug%40mail.gmail.com#ac54acd782fc849c0fe6c2c05db101dc
