Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 1:09 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2023-03-02 12:29:28 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > ... Huh... what am I missing?  I
> > thought the only risk was handlers running in the opposite of send
> > order because they 'overlapped', not non-handler code being allowed to
> > run in between.
>
> I see ProcessInterrupts() being called too - but it's independent of the
> changes we discuss here.  The reason for it is the CFI() at the end of
> errfinish().

Ahh, right, I see.