On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:27 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:30:13PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > Yes, so what about the attached patch?
>
> I see. So the first error triggering the spinlock error would cause
> a transaction failure because the fallback implementation of atomics
> uses a spinlock for this variable, and it may not initialized in this
> code path.
Why not initialise it in WalRcvShmemInit()?
