Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+gXeMzVCAg_5UgyqgQgwSScN532rNp5jGMPqo7wroUhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:27 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've gone as far as running the recovery tests on the v3-0001 patch
> using a Windows machine. They pass:

Thanks!  I pushed that one, because it was effectively a bug fix
(WaitLatch() without a latch was supposed to work).

I'll wait longer for feedback on the main patch; perhaps someone has a
better idea, or wants to take issue with the magic number 1024 (ie
limit on how many records we'll replay before we notice the postmaster
has exited), or my plan to harmonise those wait loops?  It has a CF
entry for the next CF.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories