Re: stress test for parallel workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+WZddYR4U9y2W78Ge4tsr7MXrgAFtBeUvb91vBcDqMRQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stress test for parallel workers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: stress test for parallel workers  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 4:50 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Filed at
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205183

For the curious-and-not-subscribed, there's now a kernel patch
proposed for this.  We guessed pretty close, but the problem wasn't
those dodgy looking magic numbers, it was that the bad stack expansion
check only allows for user space to expand the stack
(FAULT_FLAG_USER), and here the kernel itself wants to build a stack
frame.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16059: Tab-completion of filenames in COPY commands removesrequired quotes
Next
From: Daniel Wood
Date:
Subject: Re: 'Invalid lp' during heap_xlog_delete