Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+LyP3paszHv-a2FCH_fOPgO+eLtahwwrCD0fgkfPqMVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 2:50 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:33:17PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > As for the complaint about pg_tablespace_location() failing, would it
> > be better to return an empty string?  That's what was passed in as
> > LOCATION.  Something like the attached.
>
> Hmm, I don't think so.  The point of the function is to be able to
> know the location of a tablespace at SQL level so as we don't have any
> need to hardcode its location within any external tests (be it a
> pg_regress test or a TAP test) based on how in-place tablespace paths
> are built in the backend, so I think that we'd better report either a
> relative path from data_directory or an absolute path, but not an
> empty string.
>
> In any case, I'd suggest to add a regression test.  What I have sent
> upthread would be portable enough.

Fair enough.  No objections here.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats